News > All

Ultimate showboating frivolity
Lifestyle, 4:01
<p>A billionaire sailor no longer need feel anxious about having to wait for a limousine to pick him up when his superyacht docks at a smart Mediterranean resort. He can now take his own supercar with him.</p> <p>And the new Marine Edition Mono is rather special. </p> <p>Launched by yachting company Camper &amp; Nicholsons in collaboration with Briggs Automotive Company, the car can reach 170mph and can surge from 0-60mph in just 2.7 seconds - yet it weighs only 580kg so can easily be hoisted onto land, according to The Daily Telegraph.</p> <p>Owners can customize it by having its color match the yacht and the car’s seat molded to fit snugly. Protective coatings on the bodywork also protect against corrosion from salty air and water.</p> <p>The price-tag is £500,000 (plus delivery and VAT where applicable) or about $750,000.</p> <p>And for “superyacht owners who prefer to spend their time at sea its main purpose could simply be to serve as the ultimate showboating frivolity,” says The Daily Telegraph.<br /> Photo: mangopulp2008<br /> &nbsp;</p>
How Bitcoin is shaking up the gambling world
<p>Betting with Bitcoin is not new. The anonymity it offers has seen it be adopted for various illicit purposes since its inception and gambling is no exception. But now Bitcoin - and the nascent digital gaming industry it supports - wants to go mainstream.</p> <p>Gaming platform Augur is one of the ways in which this is happening. Augur allows participants to wager money on any future event they want - including sports events.</p> <p>The software sets the odds, collects the bets, and disperses the winnings. All the money in the system is Bitcoin, or other types of cryptocurrency, no credit cards or banks are involved.</p> <p>While peer-to-peer betting already exists on platforms like Betfair, Augur's use of blockchain technology means there is no middleman and no way to switch it off. It is drifting into uncharted waters and some are worried about its implication for governments and business. </p> <p>In the Racing Post, Tom Kerr looks at the implications of this for horse racing, but it easily applies to other sports. Firstly, the combination of an anonymous betting exchange and anonymous cryptocurrency will make it hard to keep the sport fair, he says, as racing relies on bookies flagging up suspicious bets.</p> <p>Also the platforms like Auger threaten to massively disrupt existing bookies by having no middlemen, no overround and no commission beyond 1%. It is very early days for the space Kerr adds, but the technology is now there and the  trend is going nowhere:<br /> At some point, unregulated and uncontrollable betting platforms like Augur may become commonplace. If that happens it will make the disruption betting exchanges caused to gambling and racing seem like nothing.<br /> Photo: John Athayade</p>
For Wynn, seeing $258m stolen from its Macau casino is not the worst of it
Capital Markets
<p>Lady luck is not smiling on gaming giant Wynn Resorts. Last week it was uncovered that a reported $258 million was stolen from its Macau casino in what looks like an inside job. But this is not the worst part.</p> <p>For a start, the money was not actually stolen from Wynn. The victim was a junket operating inside  the casino, Dore Group, which is said to have been ripped off by its own employees. In Macau junkets operate as third parties, bringing in cash for high rollers to use as leverage for their bets. Dore makes up a quarter of Wynn’s junket volume.</p> <p>The details as to how much money was actually stolen are also murky, as this Barron’s report explains. The trust system that operates in the junket financial system means that the money was never actually on Dore’s books therefore does not represent a loss of liquidity. Gaming research firm Union Gaming meanwhile reports that police figure of $258 million could be overstated due to a misunderstanding over currency conversion.</p> <p>But that doesn’t mean US-listed Wynn is not feeling the pain. The theft has triggered a massive 10% drop Wynn’s stock over the past week. That’s roughly $700 million wiped from its market value - a lot more than was pilfered from its partner's vaults.  </p> <p>This is not the worst seen in the Las Vegas of the East. According to Business Insider, a $1.3 billion heist from the junket Kimren in April 2014 - which analysts call Macau's "Lehman Moment." - dealt the biggest blow to Macau’s high roller market. </p> <p>But even without Asia’s Ocean Eleven smuggling out cash out of Wynn’s  front door, thing have been pretty lousy for Macau’s casino trade as a whole. Government figures show that revenues each month have been down 30% to 50% year-over-year. This is not just down to China's general economic slowdown, but also President Xi Jinping's anticorruption drive. China’s high rollers, it seems, just can’t stomach the risk anymore.</p> <p>Photo: Derek Tam</p>
Checking China's real crisis
Capital Markets
<p>The world’s investors seem to have changed their collective mind. Recent panic selling implied an implosion in China and recession elsewhere. The sudden turn to recovery and moderation indicates something much less pessimistic, if not absolutely upbeat. Since markets, as always, remain vulnerable to future emotional outbursts of this kind, it might help to take this moment of relative calm to examine some of the issues that contributed to the recent panic and that might contribute to a future panic. Of one particular importance is China’s by now long-standing real estate crisis.</p> <p>Though the evidence is muddled, statistics nonetheless yield a picture that should at once sober optimists and embarrass pessimists. On the side of bad news, there is no denying that China faces a significant real estate bubble. The adjustment to it will take a considerable time, and inevitably will have negative economic and financial implications. On the side of good news, it is clear that the adjustment has already begun and is proceeding in an orderly fashion that promises to avoid the kind of financial collapse many fear.</p> <p>The Bubble’s Extent<br /> The evidence of excess and all that goes with it is clear. Between 2012 and 2014, China engaged in significant overbuilding. By early last year, spending on residential construction had reached an unsustainable 10.4% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). That is the second highest figure on record for any country. (Only Spain’s 2006 bubble, which took such spending to 12.5% of GDP, surpassed it.) China’s rate tops Japan’s 1973 bubble peak at 8.7% of GDP and certainly this country’s 2005 peak at 6.5% of GDP. China’s breakneck pace of residential construction was at its 2013 peak in increasing floor space at a clearly unsustainable annual rate of 50%. It had increased the per-capital available floor space in China by 20%, to some 30 square meters, far above any other emerging economy and even some developed economies. Spain, for instance, has only about 27 square meters of living space per capita, and Japan has only some 22 square meters. Only the rich nations of Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia offer their populations more. This construction so far exceeded sales that unsold inventories reached astronomical levels of over two year purchases.</p> <p>Debt problems inevitably have accompanied this kind of overbuilding. Though government debt in China is still a relatively low 25% of GDP, real estate-related debt in recent years has exploded to more than twice that figure. At last measure, almost half of all outstanding credit in China was somehow related to real estate. The excesses promise to force a significant portion of this debt into default, with some estimates indicating that a fifth of all the real estate debt will fail in one way or another. Since that figure amounts to nearly one-tenth of the country’s GDP, the legacy of this overbuilding cannot help but strain Chinese financial institutions, investors, financial markets generally, and, consequently, overall economic growth prospects. The need for construction cutbacks will further impair growth prospects, not the least because residential building has until recently accounted for so much of China’s economic activity.</p> <p>Still, It Is Not the End of the World<br /> As strained as all this looks, and is, much suggests that China can avoid the implosion many from time to time have feared. After all, the evidence suggests that the adjustm</p>
Daily Scan: China investors rush in for best performance in 3 weeks; Asia finishes up
Capital Markets
<p>Updated throughout the day</p> <p>September 16 </p> <p>Good evening everyone. Investors rushed to the Chinese markets in the afternoon, ahead of a move by the China Securities Regulatory Commission to clamp down on margin lending.  The Shanghai benchmark was up almost 5% at market close, and the Shenzhen up 6.5%. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index meanwhile finished up  2.38%. Other Asian markets also saw lift today, taking their cue from Wall Street, but the rally was tempered in the region as investors remained cautious ahead of the Federal Reserve interest rate hike: </p> <p> Jakarta Composite: -0.33%<br /> KLSE Composite: +0.46%<br /> Nikkei 225: +0.81%<br /> Straits Times: +1.01%<br /> Seoul Composite: +1.96%</p> <p>Here is what else you need to know:<br /> Shares of Chinese brokerage Citic fall on police probe. Shares of China's largest brokerage, state-owned Citic Securities, fell as much as 4% after it said three executives, including its president, were under police investigation. The executives are being investigated for suspected insider trading and "leaking inside" information. BBC<br /> Macau's Wynn Resorts loses 10% on reports of $258m casino heist The gambling giant took a pounding on the markets after it was found a large junket group operating out of its Macau casino may have lost as much as 2 billion Hong Kong dollars ($258 million). Barron's<br /> White House Confirms Chinese President's first state visit. Chinese President Xi Jinping will make a state visit to the U.S. at the end of the month, the White House confirmed on Tuesday. The trip will be on September 25 and reciprocates President Barack Obama’s trip to Beijing last November.<br /> Hewlett-Packard to cut up to 10% of workforce, 30,000 jobs. The move is part of an effort to split the company into two units. The cuts will come in Hewlett Packard Enterprise, which is splitting from the firm's printer and personal computer business, and and are expected to save $2.7 billion in annual costs. The restructuring will cost $2.7 billion to implement. BBC</p> <p>China puts up gas rigs in disputed in East China sea. Pictures of Chinese structures in the East China Sea have been captured by the Japanese government showing signs of natural gas production.The unilateral development in the contested area is likely to spark fresh row between the two countries. Nikkei </p> <p>Nintendo picks new president after death. Long-serving Nintendo executive Tatsumi Kimishima will be appointed president of the firm following the death in July of Satoru Iwata. Kimishima has been a managing director at the firm since June 2013, and joined in 2000.BBC</p> <p>North Korea tries to push America’s button; its working. The U.S. has warned North Korea to refrain from "irresponsible provo</p>
Gundlach on Donald Trump, China and Fed Policy
Asset Management
<p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Despite grabbing most of the headlines and leading in many of the polls, Donald Trump is not expected to win the Republican nomination. But Jeffrey Gundlach said that Trump has done the electorate a “big favor by bringing up issues that have been conveniently buried for quite some time.”</p> <p>Gundlach is the founder and chief investment officer of Los Angeles-based DoubleLine Capital. He spoke to investors via a conference call on September 8. Slides from that presentation are available here . The focus of his talk was DoubleLine’s flagship Total Return Fund (DBLTX) and its related exchange-traded fund.</p> <p>According to Gundlach, Trump is right when he asserts that China’s infrastructure is better than that of the U.S. Quoting Trump, Gundlach said that China’s “130 shiny new airports” and “cities with glistening buildings” outclass the “collapsing bridges” and “airports that are a joke” here in the U.S. And, ironically, according to Trump, the U.S. owes China more than $1.4 trillion.</p> <p>“There seems to be something really weird about this picture,” Gundlach said. “I’m glad to see Mr. Trump is talking about these things simply because these are facts that have been there for all to see but getting very little reporting.”</p> <p>But Gundlach also criticized Trump, calling him a “full-on protectionist.”</p> <p>“We all learned in high school that it was a bad idea in the wake of flagging global growth to go to protectionist steps,” Gundlach said. Gundlach called out Trump’s plans to “build walls to keep people out and put tariffs and taxes on other countries.” Those steps might help our country’s competitiveness, but they would not increase global economic growth, Gundlach said.</p> <p>Gundlach’s comments about Trump were a sidelight to his main message – the assertion that the Fed should not raise rates and his prediction that it will not. I’ll discuss the reasoning behind that thesis along with Gundlach’s assessment of relative valuations in the bond market.</p> <p>What the Fed should – and will – do</p> <p>Economic weakness, market vulnerabilities and a lack of inflation argue against an increase in interest rates, and Gundlach cited numerous examples of each.</p> <p>“I don’t think the Fed will be able to raise interest rates this month, and I don’t really think they’re going to raise them this year,” he said. “And if they do, I think it will be a real problem.”</p> <p>Gundlach harkened to the 1970 cult-movie classic, The Rock Horror Picture Show, which included the song “Dammit Janet.” The data, Gundlach said, is “screaming ‘Dammit Janet’ don’t raise rates.”</p> <p>According to Gundlach, the World Bank and the IMF also advised the Fed against raising rates, which could risk global turmoil in the financial markets and in the emerging markets in particular.</p> <p>Indeed, the odds of a rate increase in September are only 30%, Gundlach said, based on pricing in the Treasury market.</p> <p>One key reason, according to Gundlach, is lack of growth in nominal GDP, which is growing at only 4.1% annually. That’s less than the rate of 3.7% in September 2012 when the Fed began its third quantitative easing program (QE3). Gundlach said his team at DoubleLine has shifted its focus to nominal (instead of real) GDP because “we don’t live in an inflation-adjusted world.”</p> <p>This article is an excerpt from a piece originally published by Advisor Perspectives. <br /> Photo: </p>
Colleges opt for independent investment companies in-house
Asset Management
<p>The University of Washington has joined the growing trend of U.S. universities creating investment management companies.</p> <p>Many university endowments hold enough assets to manage some, or all, investments in-house, but competition for staff is fierce. UW's $3 billion endowment says it wants better access to "best-in-class" money managers, reports the Seattle Times. Right now UW has a staff of 19 led by Keith Ferguson, formerly of Fidelity Investments.</p> <p>The University of Texas and the University of Virginia have also created more formal investment companies from their in-house investment teams, giving them more power and putting up barriers between the investments and campus politics. Harvard University established an early management company in 1974. Allowing the companies more control over compensation separate from the university can make them more attractive to skilled portfolio managers and analysts.</p> <p>&nbsp;<br /> “It’s partly to signal that we’re a mature, sophisticated operation and we function like any other investment company,” said UW spokesman Norm Arkans.<br /> UW earned 6.8% returns for the year ending June 30, a bit above the median of 3.6% for endowments over $500 million. UW's annual rate of return for the last decade is 7.5%.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;<br /> Photo: Ming-yen Hsu</p>
Well, we know one thing. Maybe. Hedge funds had a lousy month in August
Hedge Funds
<p>Yes, it's time for another measurement of hedge fund performance. Preliminary data shows the Barclay Hedge Fund Index fell 2.09% in August, its worst month since May 2012.</p> <p>But Hedge Fund Research reports a 1.87% drop for its HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index in August, also HFRI's worst since May 2012.</p> <p>Unless it wasn't all that bad, as SS&amp;C GlobalOp suggests in its August report, in which hedge funds edged down 1.02%.</p> <p>Everyone agrees the S&amp;P 500 has slipped year-to-date 4.75%; hedge funds are up more. We'll leave it at that. (BarclayHedge says they're up 0.62%.)</p> <p>Everyone also agrees that Greece and China were not good for performance -- although we always thought volatility was good for traders. The biggest winner still appears to be Biotech finds. The Barclay's Healthcare &amp; Biotechnology Index climbed 12.6%.</p> <p>So why the discrepancy in performance numbers? The biggest issue hedge fund data has is that it's all self-reported. Not that hedge funds aren't totally on the up-and-up, but they may leave some data open to interpretation when they report it. Services like HFR, Barclay, and SS&amp;C only share about 60% to 70% of the same firms and data. "While we all draw from a similar universe of hedge funds, we don't draw from the same universe of hedge funds," says Sol Waksman, founder of BarclayHedge.</p> <p>Even assets that look the same may be quite different. Equity long short is a popular category for hedge funds. Barclays breaks up this category into equity long short and equity long bias, depending on what percentage exposure the funds have. Other trackers likely don't break it up this way, making Barclays measures for equity long short smaller than other firms, says Waksman.</p> <p>"There is no best [index]," says Waksman. "If you want a better estimate, take two, three, or four of them."</p> <p>"We're not there to say, 'hey this is the best'," he adds. "We're more there to save the time of managers," by offering a filtered look at hedge funds and their performance.</p> <p>This discrepancy between funds is really unique to the alternative world that is more gray, and relies on self-reporting. Mutual funds, for instance, are required to report their holdings and performance, says Michelle Swartzentruber, senior research analyst at Morningstar. Morningstar data may differ a tiny bit from, say, Lipper, but it's going to be much more similar data across the board than with hedge funds.<br /> Photo:Moni Sertel<br /> &nbsp;</p>
Hedgie loses discrimination suit
Lifestyle, 4:01
<p>Hedge funder Alphonse "Buddy" Fletcher has lost his four year discrimination battle against a New York City co-op.</p> <p>In 2011 Fletcher accused The Dakota, made infamous as the location of John Lennon's murder, of racial discrimination, reports the New York Post. Fletcher is a longtime Dakota resident, but wished to purchase a fifth apartment in the building. The co-op says it turned down Fletcher because of his deteriorating financial situation, but Fletcher, who is black, called foul. A Manhattan judge sided with the board, throwing out the case.</p> <p>It's been a rough year for Fletcher. The hedge funder's firm, Fletcher International, is bankrupt, after a court-appointed trustee accused it of being a Ponzi scheme.</p> <p>Fletcher's wife, Ellen Pao, has had her own legal battles. Pao lost a sex discrimination case against her former employer, venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins, earlier this year, and just recently announced that she wouldn't be appealing the decision due to lack of resources.<br /> Photo: Alejandro Lavin, Jr.<br /> &nbsp;</p>
European banks battle old enemies and get it wrong again
Capital Markets
<p>I hate to say this, but European banks have a penchant for adopting similar strategies—and usually strategies that deal with yesterday’s problems instead of tomorrow’s opportunities. The recent flight from investment banking is a case in point. Swiss, German, French and British banks all have cut back their investment banking operations sharply. Some of them are embracing instead the mantra of “wealth management”.</p> <p>Rich folk, it appears they believe, will pay up for service, even though there is little magic to so-called wealth management. Wealth management is little more than portfolio diversification, combined with good tax strategies for passing wealth to succeeding generations. Asset allocation, low-cost mutual funds, and a good tax accountant or lawyer are what is called for. High management fees are not required, though perhaps the rich are willing to pay them on the theory that you get what you pay for. And maybe some like to boast about which gold-plated bank has their money.</p> <p>I do admit that a profitable part of wealth management is lending wealthy customers money they do not need. The customer wants a new Rolls, no problem. The customer wants a new yacht or an expensive painting, why spend money? Credit is available, so long as there are securities in the vault.</p> <p>There used to be another aspect to European wealth management: Tax evasion through placing funds in secret accounts and tax haven jurisdictions. There still is some of that, and it never will be entirely eradicated. But the world is moving away from permitting such shenanigans, and in twenty or so years, the jig likely will be up. It is pretty much up for U.S. taxpayers already.</p> <p>Too many banks focusing on wealth management is likely gradually to reduce fees and profitability for many of them. Building a boutique bank like Julius Baer based on wealth management still may make sense. A Credit Suisse based on wealth management will have to be a much smaller Credit Suisse.</p> <p>But if we look to the future of European finance, we can see that Europe is going to need stronger and more diversified capital markets. That is the direction in which the world naturally progresses. Traditional banks are relatively inefficient intermediators. It is naturally inefficient or dangerous to engage in spread lending and its attendant maturity transformation. That is why traditional banks have had to be subsidized—and somehow recapitalized when they fail.</p> <p>Capital markets, by contrast, match investors and borrowers/equity sellers, usually in less leveraged ways. Capital markets lenders and borrowers lose money or fail without systemic consequences.</p> <p>Yet what is happening in Europe is that the banks are impairing their ability to participate in capital markets and the authorities are trying to impair European capital markets by regulating “shadow banks”. Thus, by learning what they see as the lessons of the last crisis (they are wrong even on that, by the way), they are impairing the ability of European businesses and consumers to obtain funding. And the banks are reducing their future profitability.</p> <p>The American banks and investment banking boutiques will be only too glad to fill the void and to try to get around whatever rules the Europeans make to try to prevent efficient funding mechanisms.</p> <p>In wondering why the European banks are shooting themselves in the foot, I am guessing that they have not understood that the investment banking business as practiced in the 2000s was really two very different businesses: Trading, on the one hand, which is capital intensive and, being a zero sum game, is dangerous; and the combination of broking, underwriting and M&amp;A that is highly profitable, uses relatively little capital, and has dangers only to the extent that personnel costs are high. Managements must understand that simple distinction. But if they do, then I do not understand why they would abandon a capital-efficient, potentially highly profitable business, unless they just think they cannot compete with American ag