News > All

Video: Twitter laying off 8% of workforce and guess where the internal memo ends up
<p>The letter from newly crowned CEO Jack Dorsey appeared on Twitter, naturally.</p> <p>jack dorsey’s letter to employees. pic.twitter.com/ZUHUtZsdek<br /> — ಠ_ಠ (@MikeIsaac) October 13, 2015<br /> This sentence in the letter evoked quite a bit of derision:</p> <p>"This isn't easy. But it is right. The world needs a strong Twitter, and this is another step to get there." -- @Jack</p> <p>— ಠ_ಠ (@MikeIsaac) October 13, 2015</p> <p>On Reddit, a laid off engineer discovered his email no longer worked. What now, he asked? The comments got closed down after they hit 552.<br /> Video: CNBC<br /> Photo: JD Lasica</p>
Chinese asset manager stabbed by angry investor
<p>&nbsp;</p> <p>If you thought being taken hostage from angry employees was the worst thing that could happen to you, welcome to China!</p> <p>Stresses are clearly building as defaults mount in the financial system in China. In one sign of the times, the CEO of Global Wealth Investment (Beijing), a major China-based asset management firm, was stabbed during a meeting on Sunday. Although it was a life-threatening injury, CEO Wang Jie is expected to recover from the assault, according to financial news outlet Caixin.</p> <p>The attacker had apparently invested Rmb300,000 ($47,300) in a wealth management product that failed and led to substantial losses.</p> <p>According to knowledgeable sources, the stabbing of the Chinese asset manager was related to the collapse of Hebei Financing Investment Guarantee Group, a large Chinese government-backed guarantor. Global Wealth and other financial groups packaged and sold a variety investment products backed by loans guaranteed by defunct Hebei Financing.<br /> More on stabbing of Chinese asset manager<br /> Earlier this summer, a group of 11 non-bank lenders wrote a letter to Communist party officials in Hebei province saying there could be “unnecessary social influence” if the government did not quickly bail out Hebei Financing and make it possible for the guarantor to honor its obligations.</p> <p>CEO Wang also wrote his own letter to Hebei officials, pointing out that Hebei Financing had not paid off on guarantees on loan defaults by five companies worth Rmb227m, and that this had impacted 660 investors in Global Wealth products. According to the Caixin report, the amount owed to Global Wealth by the guarantor is now more than Rmb620m.<br /> Keep in mind that high-yielding wealth management products have become extremely popular in China over the last few years as investors were looking for investment options besides real estate, the volatile stock market and bank deposits on which interest rates are capped. Analysts note that these products are frequently used to raise funds for higher-risk borrowers who can’t get bank loans or issue bonds.<br /> Part of the problem is that the great demand for high-yield products and minimal regulation of the sector has led to a good bit of fraud, which has led to widespread protests by investors in China who have been fleeced.<br /> Of note, Global Wealth is not accused of any crimes, however, phone calls and emails to the firm were not answered on Tuesday. Furthermore, the company’s office in Beijing was closed with a note on the door saying a “criminal incident” had occurred on Sunday.</p> <p>This article was originally published by Value Walk. <br /> Photo: David Dennis</p>
How to use leveraged ETFs to beat the Fed
<p>Ten-year Treasury yields have declined 4.1 percent over the past month as market participants have continued adjusting to the Federal Reserve not raising interest rates following its September meeting.</p> <p>Perhaps that explains why inflows to fixed income exchange traded funds have been so strong this month. Heading into Monday, three of October's top four asset-gathering ETFswere bond funds while just one bond fund was found among the month's 10 worst ETFs for outflows.</p> <p>When it comes to how traders are viewing what that decision will be, Fed funds futures recently indicated that fewer than a third of fixed income traders are wagering the Fed will boost borrowing costs. However, there also is not a dearth of market observers that believe it is foregone conclusion the U.S. central bank will pass on raising rates.</p> <p>Read more at Benzinga. <br /> Photo: Brookings Institute </p>
Don’t tell my mother I’m in finance– she thinks I work in a brothel
<p>October 12, 2015<br /> London, England</p> <p>[Editor’s note: This letter was written by Tim Price, London-based wealth manager and editor of Price Value International.]</p> <p>Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first pay too much.</p> <p>How else to account for the astonishing $200 million lawsuit filed last week by billionaire bond investor Bill Gross against his former employers, Pimco?</p> <p>Like so many legal actions, this is one case where you wish both sides could lose.</p> <p>Then we had the comparably remarkable public defenestration of Daniel Godfrey, head of the UK fund management trade body the Investment Association, apparently for campaigning for greater transparency on fund fees and charges.</p> <p>It’s as if the Investment Association were an offshoot of the Volkswagen management board. (Please don’t tell my mother I work in fund management– she thinks I’m a piano player in a brothel.)</p> <p>In medicine, they have something called the Hippocratic Oath. It requires physicians to swear to uphold certain ethical standards.</p> <p>In modern fund management, there is no Hippocratic Oath. Whereas doctors are expected to “First, do no harm”, in modern fund management, iatrogenic illnesses hold sway.</p> <p>An iatrogenic illness is one that is caused by the physician himself. Fund management doctors seem to be doing the best they can to kill their own patients. Science has a word for this, too. It’s called parasite.</p> <p>There is a solution to all this insanity.</p> <p>The chief investment officer of the Yale Endowment, David Swensen, has written an excellent book entitled ‘Unconventional Success’.</p> <p>The title is an allusion to Keynes’ famous observation that fund managers, courtesy of endemic groupthink, tend to prefer (and consequently often deliver) conventional failure as opposed to unconventional success. Swensen himself has steered the Yale Endowment through many years of impressive investment returns.</p> <p>Swensen pulls few punches.</p> <p>The fund management industry involves the “interaction between sophisticated, profit-seeking providers of financial services [Keynes would have called them rentiers] and naïve, return-seeking consumers of investment products.</p> <p>“The drive for profits by Wall Street and the mutual fund industry overwhelms the concept of fiduciary responsibility, leading to an all too predictable outcome: except in an inconsequential number of cases where individuals succeed through unusual skill or unreliable luck, the powerful financial services industry exploits vulnerable individual investors.”</p> <p>The nature of ownership is crucial. To Swensen, the more mouths standing between you and your money that need to be fed, the poorer the ultimate investment return outcome is likely to be.</p> <p>In a rational world, investors would be well advised to favour smaller, entrepreneurial boutiques, or private partnerships, over larger, publicly listed full service investment operations – especially subsidiaries of banks or insurance companies – with all kinds of intermediary layers craving their share of your pie.</p> <p>The rather sickening fight over the bonus pool at Pimco now being gleefully reported in the financial media is just one example of a large fund management organisation that appears to have entirely forgotten what its core purpose is, or should be.</p> <p>This past week, and the conjunction of the Bill Gross lawsuit and the Investment Association’s Daniel Godfrey debacle, is likely to go down as one of the biggest fund management public relations disasters in history.</p> <p>Before buying any fund, a</p>
Regulations are killing Chinese quant funds
Hedge Funds
<p>Regulations are killing Chinese quant funds</p> <p>Hoping to shine post-Black Monday, mainland quant funds find out that they have nothing have dark days ahead of them.</p> <p>In an effort to curb “excessive speculation” post market rout, the China Financial Futures Exchange clamped on a series of regulations back in August, including raising margin requirements on stock index futures from 30% to 40%, and restricting the opening of positions from 600 contracts to just 10 per product a day, defining anything over that as “irregular.”</p> <p>Well, according to the SCMP, that didn’t work so well for the nation’s burgeoning hedge fund industry – especially for its futures-oriented quants.<br /> “We thought a bear market would help us stand out, and actually we did, but things were turned upside down by the new regulations on stock index futures trading.”<br /> Faced with higher expenses and limited ways in which to seek alpha – or even hedge, for that matter – hundreds of mainland quant funds have been forced to close up shop this year, while some of those still in operation have simply shifted to survival mode.</p> <p>Further complicating matters is the fact that these guys are typically smaller operations, making it difficult for them to branch into different asset classes as their bread and butter dries up, as Reorient chief Brett McGonegal related to the SCMP:<br /> “If you have only three employees in your firm, how can you manage to achieve a well-rounded asset class allocation and develop effective risk management platforms?”<br /> With regulators desperately clinging to whatever shred of credibility they have left, there just seems to be no way for the industry to get back to its feet.</p> <p>After every hardship comes ease though, so whoever’s cutting his teeth in this twilight of the quants is sure to be a monster. Let’s see who does.<br /> Photo credit: JERRYANG</p>
Blockchain startups seeking a home can face a regulatory 'Catch 22'
FinTech
<p>Startups dealing in bitcoin and blockchain can find themselves between a rock and a hard place when looking for the right jurisdiction in which to base their business.</p> <p>During a panel discussion on regulation at the "Smart Contract for Smart Cities" conference in Hong Kong's Cyberport Tuesday, industry experts explained that entrepreneurs seeking a base had to strike a difficult balance between finding an environment that is conducive to business versus one that affords clients better protection. Pamela Morgan, the CEO of consulting and cryptographic key management firm Third Key Solutions said:</p> <p>"There is a tension right now between the ease of setting up in a place that is less regulated and the fact that consumers prefer an environment that has better regulations -- it's a Catch 22. Business are currently looking to set up in places like the Isle of Man,  but as a consumer you may want the protection of U.S. or European laws, and the clarity they offer."</p> <p>Richard Levin, a partner with law firm Bryan Cave, said the best approach was to prioritize those markets that offer the best opportunities, even if that means dealing with more regulatory hurdles.</p> <p>"You have to look at the size of the market and think 'where am I  going to make most money and get highest valuation for my company?' Sometimes biting the bullet and dealing with a cumbersome regulatory environment is something you have to do to reach your potential."<br /> Photo: NexChange</p>
China Huarong faces tough IPO competition
<p>China’s biggest player in the distressed-asset space might need some de-stressing on the road to its long-awaited Hong Kong IPO.</p> <p>The Nikkei Asian Review reports that China Huarong’s upcoming $2.5 billion offering might not be the blockbuster it was cracked up to be, largely thanks to a slew of behemoths IPOs scheduled around the same time:<br /> “Alvin Cheung Chi-wan, associate director at Prudential Brokerage, expressed doubt that investors can digest a multibillion Huarong IPO. He said that there would be competition for investors' money as there is a swollen pipeline of big IPOs due to come in October, including that of Chinese International Capital Corp, an investment bank looking to raise about $1 billion.”<br /> Aside from the CICC, China Re – the region’s largest reinsurer – is also set to sell 5.77 billion of its shares this month.</p> <p>Further complicating matters for Huarong is its valuation. Analysts currently peg the asset manager’s shares at around 1.2 times book value, a decent estimate whichever way you look at it, save for the fact that Cinda – its closest rival – currently trades below book value.</p> <p>And that’s not all, state-owned enterprises apparently aren’t allowed to sell below book, giving its advisers – Goldman, CICC, HSBC, just to name a few – with very few options left to fulfill their duties.</p> <p>Still, it isn’t all bad news. Being a state-owned enterprise still brings the cache of being backed by Beijing, not to mention a rep that these shares are off-limits to short-term speculation. And that alone should help it attract more than a few investors.<br /> Photo: See-ming Lee</p>
Strength in numbers: Hong Kong's burgeoning crowdfunding industry
<p>Crowdfunding is lowering the entry barriers for would-be venture capitalists worldwide. As one of Asia's bigggest financial centers, Hong Kong is quickly becoming a breeding ground for equity crowdfunding platform -- but regulators need to keep pace.</p> <p>To date, the crowdfunding ecosystem has been populated by reward-based platforms -- think Kickstarter and Indigogo in the U.S. - this is because offering material rewards instead of equity allows crowdfunding to avoid regulatory headaches while accessing a wider of pool of unaccrediated investors. Hong Kong's latest addition to this ecosystem is rewards-based platform SparkRaise. Its founder Yeone Moser Fok tells NexChange:</p> <p>“Crowdfunding platforms have the potential to turn traditional fundraising on its head.  It is becoming easier to invest in startups and more people now have the chance to back the projects they love.”</p> <p>She adds that these platforms offer startups two things: customer acquisition and product validation. Raising capital to complete the first run of a product is not only difficult, it's a big risk.  Crowdfunding plaftorm help startups raise capital while ensuring there is demand for a product. However, Fok notes that future  advances in regulation could see equity-based platforms being more widelyt adopted. She adds:</p> <p>“The JOBS Act in the U.S. has been a big leap forward for equity crowdfunding but it’s still early days.  In Asia, particularly in Hong Kong, there are still more regulatory hurdles to jump through before we see more equity-based platforms here.”<br /> That is not to suggest equity-based platforms do not exist in Hong Kong. There already platforms like BigColors, Colony88, and Investable that offer some form of equity crowdfunding, though exisiting regulations mean that investments are restricted to professional investors, meaning the minimum ticket size excludes mom and pop backers. Investable founder Jennifer Carver explains:</p> <p>"Right now the minumm investment is $10,000 on Investable and as an  angel investor you always have to be prepared to just say goodbye to that money. That said, we have a broad range of services so that our startups stand a better chance of survival than most, but it's still a high risk investment that's not suitable for all types of investors"<br />  Photo: James Cridland</p>
7 takeaways from Brainard’s speech
<p>Vice-Federale Stanley Fischer may have kicked uncertainty up a notch by calling a 2015 rate hike “an expectation, not a commitment,” but ex-Under Secretary of the Treasury Lael Brainard was a little more forthcoming as far as her stance on rates are concerned.</p> <p>Here are seven key takeaways from her speech at the 57th National Association for Business Economics Annual Meeting.</p> <p>She thinks labor resources are still under-utilized.  “…a variety of evidence suggests there may be some distance to go to achieve full employment. Although the unemployment rate is near longer-run norms, other measures of labor utilization are not. The labor force participation rate remains materially below the pre-recession trend, even after adjusting for demographics.”</p> <p>And the Fed may have an eye on it too. “Perhaps the most striking evidence in support of continued labor market slack is the absence of any acceleration in wages and prices…Indeed, the lack of wage acceleration is likely one of the key reasons that many Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) participants have revised down their estimates of the longer-run level of the unemployment rate.”</p> <p>Consumer spending looks solid. “…even though equity prices are down this year, continued job growth, lower gas prices, rising house prices and some loosening in consumer credit look likely to support consumer spending over the second half of the year.”</p> <p>But they’re worried about inflation. “Although the balance of evidence thus suggests that long-term inflation expectations are likely to have remained fairly steady, the risks to the near-term outlook for inflation appear to be tilted to the downside, given the persistently low level of core inflation and the recent decline in longer-run inflation compensation, as well as the deflationary cross currents emanating from abroad.”</p> <p>She isn’t a hyper-Keynesian. “To be clear, I do not view the improvement in the labor market as a sufficient statistic for judging the outlook for inflation. A variety of econometric estimates would suggest that the classic Phillips curve influence of resource utilization on inflation is, at best, very weak at the moment.”</p> <p>China matters. “A more negative assessment of underlying Chinese growth fundamentals or its exchange rate regime would likely affect other important economies in the region, as well as commodity-producing economies, pushing global demand down further. In turn, expectations of additional weakness in global demand could have important effects on the exchange rate of the dollar, the valuation of risky assets in the United States, and U.S. inflation, moving the economy further from our goals.”</p> <p>And she thinks the Fed should cool its jets for a while. “There is a risk that the intensification of international cross currents could weigh more heavily on U.S. demand directly, or that the anticipation of a sharper divergence in U.S. policy could impose restraint through additional tightening of financial conditions. For these reasons, I view the risks to the economic outlook as tilted to the downside. The downside risks make a strong case for continuing to carefully nurture the U.S. recovery--and argue against prematurely taking away the support that has been so critical to its vitality.”<br /> Photo: Fortune Live Media</p>
China is not collapsing
<p>LONDON – One question has dominated the International Monetary Fund’s annual meeting this year in Peru: Will China’s economic downturn trigger a new financial crisis just as the world is putting the last one to bed? But the assumption underlying that question – that China is now the global economy’s weakest link – is highly suspect.</p> <p>China certainly experienced a turbulent summer, owing to three factors: economic weakness, financial panic, and the policy response to these problems. While none on its own would have threatened the world economy, the danger stemmed from a self-reinforcing interaction among them: weak economic data leads to financial turmoil, which induces policy blunders that in turn fuel more financial panic, economic weakness, and policy mistakes.</p> <p>Such self-reinforcing financial feedback is much more powerful in transmitting global economic contagion than ordinary commercial or trade exposures, as the world learned in 2008-2009. The question now is whether the vicious circle that began in China over the summer will continue.</p> <p>Click here to read more</p> <p>© Project Syndicate<br /> Photo: Danijel James</p>